Skip to content
05.16.2025 by Michael Roytman

Only Your Data Can Truly Anticipate Threats

In cybersecurity, understanding exploitation threats hinges on the quality and source of the data analyzed. Traditionally, vulnerability management has relied heavily on secondary source data, such as Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) lists, which compile vulnerabilities based on reported incidents. While these lists provide valuable references, relying solely on them leaves significant blind spots. Secondary sources, by nature, reflect past events, often with delays and incomplete context, leading organizations to respond reactively rather than proactively.

Primary source exploitation activity data, derived directly from real-world telemetry, offers a crucial advantage. Instead of merely cataloging past incidents, primary source data captures active exploitation attempts as they occur across environments, providing real-time, actionable intelligence. This immediate insight allows security teams to rapidly identify emerging threats and prioritize responses based on actual risk rather than historical precedents.

The integration of primary source data with advanced machine learning models further elevates vulnerability management practices. Machine learning algorithms trained on real-time, primary exploitation activity can detect subtle patterns, predict potential threats, and automate response recommendations with unprecedented accuracy. In contrast, secondary source data, limited by its retrospective and static nature, cannot effectively leverage machine learning capabilities to anticipate and neutralize evolving threats.

In essence, secondary source data like KEV lists, while informative, cannot stand alone. Organizations aiming for robust, proactive cybersecurity must embrace primary source telemetry enriched by machine learning. This combination transforms vulnerability management from a reactive compliance task into a dynamic, predictive defense strategy.

Unique CVEs with Exploitation Activity